Discover
Map the work, people, systems, inputs, decisions and exceptions.
Output: current-state process map
The Sync360 method
Technology enters after the process, value and controls are understood. Each stage gives the next one a clear decision.

Eight stages
Map the work, people, systems, inputs, decisions and exceptions.
Output: current-state process map
Establish volume, time, delays, error rates, cost and missed value.
Output: evidence-backed baseline
Compare expected value and feasibility. Higher risk lowers priority or requires stronger controls.
Output: ranked opportunity case
Remove unnecessary steps and clarify ownership before automating anything.
Output: future-state workflow
Define approval thresholds, exceptions, data access, monitoring and fallback paths.
Output: control and operating model
Apply rules, integrations and AI according to the redesigned process.
Output: tested working workflow
Prepare users, launch carefully and compare performance with the baseline.
Output: adoption and value report
Monitor exceptions, refine the design and expand only when evidence supports it.
Output: improvement backlog
Shared responsibility
Explain the work, validate exceptions, agree controls and own the operating outcome.
Maps, challenges, designs, builds and measures the improved process.
Test the workflow against real work and show where the design needs to adapt.
Engagement levels
An initial conversation can identify whether an opportunity deserves more work. Detailed design and a business case require evidence from the real process.
A focused first conversation about the process, the friction and the result that matters.
Decision: stop, clarify or assess
Process mapping, baseline evidence, opportunity design, feasibility, controls and priorities.
Decision: roadmap or implementation proposal
Detailed design, build, integration, testing, adoption, monitoring and value review.
Decision: improve, scale or retire
After launch
A reliable process makes exceptions, monitoring and responsibility visible. Those operating decisions are designed with the workflow.
Process owners and users need to explain the real work, validate exceptions, test the design and own the operating result. Sync360 cannot infer those decisions from software alone.
Approval sits where the impact, uncertainty or commitment requires judgement. We define thresholds and escalation paths during process and control design.
The workflow should expose the failure, preserve the record, retry only when safe and route unresolved work to a named owner.
We compare agreed measures with the starting baseline and record limitations such as volume, adoption or seasonal change.
Describe where time, revenue or control is being lost. We will review whether it is a credible automation opportunity.